Análise de diferentes volumes de HIIT sobre os parâmetros de estresse oxidativo e danos musculares

• Ano de defesa: 2024
• Autor(a) principal: Jesus, Everton Santos de
• Orientador(a): Souza, Lúcio Marques Vieira
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Pós-Graduação em Educação Física
• Palavras-chave em Português: Educação física; Exercícios físicos; Periodização do treinamento físico; Stress oxidativo; Natação; Sistema musculoesquelético (ferimentos e lesões); Treino intervalado de alta intensidade; Volume; Espécies reativas de oxigênio
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: High intensity interval training; Reactive oxygen species
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::EDUCACAO FISICA
• Link de acesso: https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/19447

Introduction: High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is an exercise modality that can induce reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in skeletal muscles, the extent of which depends on the intensity, duration, and volume of exercise, potentially leading to oxidative stress. Objective: To analyze the effects of a single session of two HIIT protocols with different intensity levels on the markers of blood sugar, lactate, and hepatic damage in rats. Methods: Overall, 24 male Wistar rats were included in the study and divided into three groups (n = 8/group): Control Group (CG); HIIT involving 14 swimming periods lasting 20 s each, with 10-s intervals between each period, totaling a duration of 7 min (H1); and HIIT involving 14 swimming periods lasting 35 s each, with 25-s intervals between each period, totaling a duration of 14 min (H2). Results: Regarding blood sugar levels, there were no significant differences in the H1 (113.00 ± 8.21 vs. 123.25 ± 10.78; p = 0.3303) and H2 (112.25 ± 12.55 vs. 114.25 ± 8.77; p = 0.9545) groups, respectively. Regarding lactate levels, there was a significant difference in both the groups compared with the CG (H1: 2.75 ± 0.55 vs. 10.06 ± 1.93; p = 0.0003; H2: 2.65 ± 1.07 vs. 9.99 ± 1.30; p = 0.0001). However, there was no difference in lactate levels between the H1 and H2 groups (10.06 ± 1.93 vs. 9.99 ± 1.30; p = 0.9965). Regarding hepatic damage, only H1 demonstrated a reduction in aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) levels compared with CG (30% and 29.65%, respectively; p < 0.05). Conversely, there were no significant differences in the AST levels between both the groups and CG (16.40 ± 1.91 [H2] vs. 13.98 ± 1.06 [CG]; −14.75%; p = 0.0918; 11.48 ± 1.59 [H1] vs. 13.98 ± 1.06 [H2]; p = 0.0792). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the ALT levels between the HIIT groups (8.54 ± 1.70 [H1] vs. 10.32 ± 0.78 [H2]; p = 0.1756). Conclusion: A single HIIT training session with different volumes does not induce changes in the glycemia marker, as for lactate, a single HIIT session was able to significantly increase plasma lactate values by more than 365% and 375% in groups H1 and H2 in relation to your pre-HIIT session rest time. However, no difference in lactate concentration was detected between protocols H1 and H2. Furthermore, shortterm HIIT caused changes in liver markers AST and ALT compared to the control group. However, when comparing the groups studied, no significant changes were observed after a single HIIT session.