Relações heterodiscursivas na constituição do enunciado bíblico Eu Sou: uma análise dialógica sob horizonte círculo-bakhtiniano

• Ano de defesa: 2021
• Autor(a) principal: Santana, Wilder Kleber Fernandes de
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal da Paraíba; Brasil; Linguística; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística; UFPB
• Palavras-chave em Português: Relações heterodiscursivas; Constituição; Enunciado bíblico; Eu sou; Jesus; Heterodiscursive relationships; Constitution; Biblical declaration; Relaciones heterodiscursivas; Constitución; Declaración bíblica; CNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICA
• Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/23535

One of the premises of Bakhtinian thought is that language consists of an essentially social and heterogeneous activity, which presents itself to the researcher/ speaker/ exposited/ listener in a multifaceted way, in its plural, multiple, dense dimension. Within the scope of Bakhtinian studies, motivated by investigation in the biblical field, the research question arose: How to relate heterodiscursives in John’s narratives based on the mobilization of the utterance EU SOU, by the enunciative subject Jesus Christ? We start from the following premise: as the subject-author uses linguistic-enunciative strategies in the mobilization and updating of the EU SOU utterance, in his discourse, multiple heterodiscursive relationships are established. Thus, the study delimited as a general objective to analyze the heterodiscursive relations in the re-emphasis of the utterance EU SOU based on the narrative of the Gospel of John. It is, therefore, a production of a qualitative-interpretative nature. The biblical version that was adopted as support and reference for the composition of this paper was the Jerusalem Bible (New Revised and Expanded Edition), whose translation was made directly from the original texts (Hebrew and Greek). The theoretical basis that underlies our paper guided the discussion and analysis from the perspective of the Dialogical Discourse Analysis approach (BRAIT, 2005), which reinserts the theory formulated by Bakhtin (2006, 2010, 2012) in the field of philosophical-scientific productions. Medviédev (2016 [1928]) and Volóchinov (2017 [1929]) and their interlocutors in the scenario of research developed both in Brazil and internationally, represented by the papers of Brait (2006, 2012), Miotello (2010), Nóbrega (2007), Paula (2012), Francelino (2013), e Almeida (2013), among others. In view of our analytical act, in the course of Jesus' arguments in discourses about himself and about God in the presentation and constitution of the EU SOU, 21 (twenty one) types of heterodiscursive relationships were identified, such as which cover up the most varied forms of discursive manifestation. These relationships only exist through the movement of discourses in a social terrain, through which it is possible to verify the summoning of consciences under consciences, as in the case of the confrontation between Jesus and the inside, from the narrative of João. Given these specificities, we find that all these relationships, identified in the heterodiscursive arena of language, are permeated and constituted in the social stratification of language. The results pointed to the fact that heterodiscursive relationships enhance the analyst's view of biblical-religious enunciation(s) in the summoning of memories constituted in other consciences, as demonstrated in the confrontation between Jesus and the Jewish-Pharisaic groups, in the unveiling of themes such as the priestly role of the messiah, the preexistence and recognition of the divinity, among others.