Vivência e projeto de vida de jovens em cumprimento de medidas socioeducativas

• Ano de defesa: 2017
• Autor(a) principal: Costa, Cibele Soares da Silva
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal da Paraíba; Brasil; Psicologia Social; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia Social; UFPB
• Palavras-chave em Português: Juventude; Medidas socioeducativas; Vivência; Projeto de Vida; Plano Individual de Atendimento; Youth; Socio-Educational measures; Experience; Life Project; Individual Plan of Attendance; CIENCIAS HUMANAS::PSICOLOGIA
• Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/tede/9109

The general objective of this thesis is to analyze the implications of the experience of juveniles undergoing socio-educational measures in the construction of their life projects. Its specific objectives are: to analyze the experience of juveniles undergoing socio-educational measures; to identify the life project created by juveniles from the experiences of undergoing socio-educational measures; to identify the life project created by juveniles from the experiences of undergoing socio-educational measures, and to identify in the Individual Plan of Attendance (PIA) the records about the life project of juveniles undergoing socio-educational measures. The theoretical framework of this work follows Vygotsky’s Cultural-Historical Theory, making use of the following theoretical categories: Experience, Sense and Life Project. This research was carried out at an institution which performs socio-educational measures in João Pessoa/PB, by way of individual interviews and a documentary research, concerning the records on the life project in the Individual Plan of Attendance. Ten juveniles were interviewed and five PIAs were analyzed. For data analysis, descriptive and thematic content analysis were conducted. The results have shown that the socio-educational measure is signified by the juveniles as a prison and marked by idleness, but contradictorily their speeches have also pointed towards the protective function, the opportunity of school reinsertion and of doing a professionalizing course. With regard to the analyzed PIAs, it was observed that they presented incomplete data, not enabling for the identification of the juveniles’ life project. It was noted that in socio-educational measures the sanctioning character is highlighted over pedagogical action.