Elaboração de farinhas de flores de hibisco colibri (Malvaviscus arboreus Cav. ) e cunhã (Clitoria ternatea L.): aspectos físicos e morfológicos

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2024
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Anna Izaura Balbino dos
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal da Paraíba
Brasil
Agricultura
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Agrárias (Agroecologia)
UFPB
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/34166
Resumo: Unconventional Food Plants (UFPs) have gained traction in both academic and gastronomic domains, driven by current trends towards healthier diets. The use of various UFPs as alternative sources of nutrients and minerals is increasingly prevalent in human nutrition. Species such as Malvaviscus arboreus (Turk's cap) and Clitoria ternatea (butterfly pea) are utilized for their nutritional and medicinal values across different cultures. This study aimed to develop and characterize flours derived from the drying of Malvaviscus arboreus and Clitoria ternatea flowers, focusing on their thermal, physical, and structural properties. Flowers were individually dried in a forced-air oven at temperatures of 50, 60, 70, and 80 °C, with drying kinetics analyzed and mathematical models applied to the data. The resulting flours were characterized for physical parameters, particle morphology via scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and thermal properties using thermogravimetric analysis (TG/DTG). The Logarithmic model best fit the drying kinetics of Malvaviscus arboreus, while the Page model provided the best fit for Clitoria ternatea. SEM revealed irregular structures with particles of varying sizes in both hibiscus and butterfly pea flours. Hibiscus flour exhibited more compact and regular particles, whereas butterfly pea flour showed more porous and irregular particles. Differences in the drying temperatures for the two flower species did not notably affect their structural characteristics.