A promoção de accountability na organização mundial do comércio sob a ótica do direito administrativo global

• Ano de defesa: 2014
• Autor(a) principal: Figueiredo, Celso Henrique Cadete de
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal da Paraí­ba; BR; ciências Juridicas; Programa de Pós Graduação em Ciências Jurídicas; UFPB
• Palavras-chave em Português: Governança Global; Direito Administrativo Global; Accountability; Organização Mundial do Comércio; Global Governance; Global Administrative Law; World Trade Organization; CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
• Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/tede/4427

The Global Administrative Law theory has risen as an alternative to the traditional reading of global governance, interpreting that much of global regulatory governance can be seen as a form of administration. For this reason, it has included a range of actors, other than states, as global agents capable of making decisions, norms and standard, within specific legal regimes (understood as types of administration), encompassed in a global administrative space, in which practices are optimized by adoption of domestic administrative law tools and principles, where accountability is lied as a central mechanism once it serves as a way of strengthening the legitimacy of global law. In this sense, it can be highlighted the struggle of clearly determining, sometimes, who is affected by the law that emerges from GAL, leaving the civil society with the role of representing the global public . The present study aims ultimately to understand the notion of accountability applied from GAL s perspective, within an exercise of identifying central elements that allows the attainment of accountability mechanisms e.g. the establishment of standards, propagation of information and enforcement of standards through sanctions in WTO s scope, under a horizontal level i.e. considering only the states as likely of applying accountability and, under a vertical level i.e. listing civil society as the final recipient of multilateral system trade rules as a manner of exploring until where WTO can be seen as accountable and, therefore, can reinforce the legitimacy of its rules within the global administrative space.