Os advérbios modalizadores no uso da língua: uma análise discursivo-pragmática
Ano de defesa: | 2014 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal da Paraíba
BR Linguística Programa de Pós Graduação em Linguística UFPB |
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Link de acesso: | https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/tede/6433 |
Resumo: | This work consists of a discourse-pragmatic analysis through the use of modal adverbs with suffix ly, corpora that are materialized in the group Speech and Grammar, and that, in some way, represent the effects of meaning produced by language users in their enunciation. As the modality is likely to occur through some linguistic elements, the choice was made by adverbs because these elements present various linguistic behaviors: morphological, syntactic and semantic level. Thus, as the phenomenon of modality is, somehow, performed through pragmatic and discursive factors, we believe it is also important to analyze this category through these factors that recurrently represent the modality.So, knowing that in the enunciation, the sender shows some marks that allow the reader / listener infer certain attitudes in the communicative event, this research analyzes, a hypothetical-deductive notion that meaning effects are represented from sentences that are using adverbs modalizers ended in ly. To do so, we observe these linguistic elements through texts extracted from corpora (D & G) and thus through the phenomenon of prototypicality to conclude that the adverbs modalizers ended in ly are frequente and allows us to assume that their occurrence is continuous on distinct communicative interactions. Then, we observe what type of modality the language user uses frequently: deontic, evaluative and epistemic, and after that, we discuss their implications for the communication process. |