Crenças societais acerca da violência de gênero

• Ano de defesa: 2021
• Autor(a) principal: Amorim, Isabelle Tavares
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso embargado
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal da Paraíba; Brasil; Psicologia Social; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia Social; UFPB
• Palavras-chave em Português: Violência de gênero; Crenças; Psicometria; Variáveis sociodemográficas; Gender violence; Beliefs; Psychometrics; Sociodemographic variables; Violence sexiste; Croyances; Psychométrie; Variables sociodémographiques; CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::PSICOLOGIA
• Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/27514

Based on the thesis that sociodemographic and socioeconomic elements can reflect on the way the individual sees and evaluates the world, and the influences of such elements can also contribute to the process of construction, maintenance and sharing of beliefs about violence of gender, emerged as general objective analyzing societal beliefs about gender violence, two studies with independent samples were proposed. The first study addressed the elaboration and psychometric parameters of the Societal Beliefs Scale for The Legitimation of Gender Violence for the adult population. From the Free Words Association Technique applied to 201 high school students, 61 items were obtained, grouped into five subscales predetermined from the classification of the Maria da Penha Law, later applied to a sample of 220 adults. Factor analysis was used by the Main Components method and Cronbach's alpha to evaluate the internal consistency indexes. The analysis of variance and comparison of means (pair by pair) was made by one-way variance analysis (ANOVA), verifying the significance of the differences by the Tukey test. As a result, a unifactorial structure was obtained for all subscales: (1)Sexual Violence,13 items explaining 41.4% of variance and Cronbach's Alpha of 0.858; (2) Psychological Violence, 14 items explaining 39.3% of variance and Cronbach's Alpha of 0.871; (3) Physical Violence, 13 items explaining 40.8% of variance and Cronbach's Alpha of 0.849; (4) Property violence, 08 items explaining 46.3% of variance and Cronbach's Alpha of 0.820; and (5) Moral Violence , 12 items explaining 43.3% of variance and Cronbach's Alpha of 0.849. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey Test showed significance of the differences between the means of the items. It was concluded that, despite the need to collect more information that supports these psychometric properties, especially in increasing the variability of responses, the results indicate evidence of content and criterion validity, as well as internal consistency of the measurement. The second study aimed to identify the modal typology of societal beliefs about gender violence and the influence of associated socioeconomic and institutional variables. The sample consisted of 202 participants, via online platforms, being 59.9% female, with ages ranging from 19 to 59 years, 68% in the age group from 18 to 29 years, who answered the "Gender Violence Legitimizing Beliefs Scale for Adults" and a questionnaire including socioeconomic aspects, analyzed by descriptive statistics, association test (ANOVA and Test t), Pearson correlation and Multivariate Regression (Stepwise). The results showed a greater explanation of Physical Violence (R²=,844), presenting three predictor variables: age group (5% of variance); Religious Affiliation (5% explanation); Gender and Family Income (with 5% and 2% prediction, respectively). Mental Violence: Religiosity (6%); Sex (5%) and Marital Status (2%). Psychological Violence was predicted by sex (6%), religiosity (7%) and marital status (3%). Property violence with sex (5%), religious affiliation (7%), racial identity (2%), marital status (2%) and schooling (2%). Finally, Sexual Violence with Religious Affiliation (6%), Age Group (4%) and Sex (3%). Gender Violence should be understood as structural because it materializes in any aspect of life and is transmitted from the mechanisms of socialization. Finally, in the Final Chapter, general considerations are made at the intersection between the proposed theory and the results achieved.