Direito, força e anomia: deslegitimação do estado e liberdade em Hans Kelsen

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2014
Autor(a) principal: Diego Antonio Perini Milão
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
UFMG
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/BUBD-9XMJSP
Resumo: The traditional reading of Reine Rechtslehre teach us that Hans Kelsen, inspired by Kants philosophy, develops a pure law science, aiming a description of the statutory law based in a cognitive functionality and not evaluative. Thus, the Pure Theory of Law does not intend to legitimize any form or type of State, because, based on the axiological relativism, Kelsen keeps away the values of the field of law science, such a fact configures as a epistemological presupposition. The given research aims to demonstrate that the Pure Theory of Law, although does not make a legitimate, provides the ways and possibilities for individuals to promote the delegitimation of the juridical order and, consequentially, of the State. This is possible thanks to the phenomenon of the progress of anomy situations which consecrates the relativist philosophy present in Kelsens works and express itself as the true exercise of freedom understood by Kelsen as moral autonomy -, which takes to a deconstruction of the authority symbol and consequentially the non-presupposition of the hypothetical fundamental norm, removing the validity of the juridical planning. This way, it is possible to articulate the rereading of the philosophical bases of the knowledge theory assumed by Reine Rechtslehre, incorporating elements of Ernest Cassirer epistemology, mainly the consideration of a functional thought determining over a substantial reasoning, which allows us to establish a bond between political philosophy, law science and the Viennas Scholl masters democracy theory and takes us to affirm that there is not another Kelsen, but instead, Kelsen himself present in all the fields of his wide works.