A presença do analista no hospital geral e o manejo da transferência em situação de urgência subjetiva

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2014
Autor(a) principal: Glauco Batista
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
UFMG
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/BUBD-AQKJSG
Resumo: Modern medicine increasingly based on techno-science is based on a logic that excludes the subject as subjectivity. However, by the very fact of an agreement does not exist between the physician, the patient and the analyst as to the meaning given to trauma, and does not have as eliminate helplessness and own finitude admitted to a hospital patient, deadlock situations always involved and the subjective dimension breaks, at which summons the psychoanalyst to solve the problem. From this point, it becomes a matter worthy of reflection the place the analyst occupy in the general hospital, the nature of its insertion into the staff as well as the power of his performance and where it operates. In this perspective, this study aimed to give greater accuracy to the notion of subjective urgency and its related concepts: trauma, anxiety, panic and helplessness. In addition, to articulate the concept of transference to the subjective urgency in order to give rise to creativity and complicity of the analyst so that it can sustain the necessary space for subjectivity emerge in the hospital. The method used to achieve these objectives was the literature review and case study. The results of this research imply that the position of the analyst in a hospital staff is of the order of a construction and only made possible because of the establishment of the transference. This is because in the psychoanalytic field, that it is always a gamble in this specific case, how the medical staff react to the emergence of subjectivity: with a demand to know about it, or with a request for trouble solution?