Elaboração e validação de conteúdo de um catálogo de meios de treinamento para as provas de velocidade do atletismo

• Ano de defesa: 2017
• Autor(a) principal: Gabriel Araujo Soares
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; UFMG
• Palavras-chave em Português: Atletismo; Carga de treinamento; Especificidade; Esportes Treinamento técnico; Corridas
• Link de acesso: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/EEFF-BB6UUJ

Many coaches are guided by empirical evidence at the moment of planning the training loads. Also, many times, these training loads do not recorded for a posterior analysis of training process. Use a scientific instrument elaborated and validated may help coaches in planning, registration and analysis of sports training load. Athletics is a sport composed by events of running, jumps and throw. Amongst the running events, the speed events are the most popular and are composed by 100, 200 and 400 meters dash. The study aimed to elaborate and assess the content validity of a catalog of training means for speed track events. A group of ten expert coaches elaborated a catalog of exercises through interviews, ansewring which exercises are used in the training of technical, coordinating and physical capacities for sprinter athletes. Two groups of raters, one with a high level of academic degree and other with less level, evaluated content validity indicators as Clarity of Language (CL), Practical Pertinence (PP) and Theoretical Relevance (TR). The group of raters with high level of academic degree associated the elaborated exercises to physical training methods and intensity levels and the dimension of each exercise. The coefficient of content validity (CCV) was used as tool to statistically measure the values found for CL, PP and TR. The dimension was determinated by means of scores assigned on a four point scale and the level of concordance among judges was measured by Kappa Coefficient. A catalog containing 85 exercises was elaborated, but ten were eliminated from the catalog by presenting CCV to PP or TR below the cut-off point. The final catalog was composed by 75 training means, being 16 general, 24 special and 35 specific, and presented satisfactory CCV values. The level of concordance among judges presented moderate and substantial agreement results for the analyzes performed. According to the results, content validity has been established for training means and this catalog can be a useful tool for speed track coaches at the moment of selection, recording and analysis of training loads