Verificação automática dos requisitos de projetos da norma de desempenho pela plataforma Bim Solibri Model Checker

• Ano de defesa: 2017
• Autor(a) principal: Flávio Paulino de Andrade e Silva
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; UFMG
• Palavras-chave em Português: Norma de desempenho; BIM; Verificação automática; Projetos Avaliação; Modelagem de informação da construção; Normas técnicas (Engenharia); Construção civil
• Link de acesso: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/BUOS-B32NDG

The Performance Standard - NBR 15,575 has the objective of establishing guidelines for the execution of safer residential developments, with quality and longevity (ABNT 15.575, 2013). A significant part of the requirements of this Standard refers to projects. The automatic verification of normative parameters through rules introduced in the computational systems has been shown to be efficient, as it reduces the time of verification and analysis of the projects and can contribute to increase the precision of the results (Rodrigues, 2015). In this direction, the present work aimed to evaluate the applicability, adherence and challenges of verifying design requirements of the performance standard automatically using the Solibri Model Checker (SMC) software, for use in BIM virtual construction models. Within this main objective we sought: a) parameterize a set of rules through the SMC in order to partially meet the design requirements of NBR15,575; b) to propose a tool that facilitates the translation of normative guidelines into the SMC language and c) to test and evaluate the proposed parameterization in an enterprise linked to the government project My Home My Life modeled by Revit software. The research was based on the method called constructive research. Notwithstanding the limitations of the SMC platform, it was possible to encode approximately one-third of the design requirements of the Standard for checking automatically. It is worth noting that efforts to link the requirements of the standard to SMC checking were not carried out directly, ie on average more than 4 rules of the software to verify a single requirement of the standard. The study found a reduction in project conferencing time of around 60% and still pointed to 22% more nonconformities than the manual conference method