Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2022 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
ARAÚJO, Rayssa Marchão
 |
| Orientador(a): |
CARVALHO, Zilmara de Jesus Viana de
|
| Banca de defesa: |
CARVALHO, Zilmara de Jesus Viana de
,
FAÇANHA, Luciano da Silva
,
SILVA, Cacilda Bonfim e
|
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal do Maranhão
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM CULTURA E SOCIEDADE/CCH
|
| Departamento: |
DEPARTAMENTO DE FILOSOFIA/CCH
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tedebc.ufma.br/jspui/handle/tede/4109
|
Resumo: |
It approaches the Brazilian political memory of the civil-military dictatorship period (1964- 1985) and aims to carry out a critical reflexive analysis of this historical moment. The research has as main theoretical reference the thought of the contemporary philosopher Hannah Arendt (1906-1975), who was concerned with developing a political-philosophical understanding of the remarkable events of the 20th century. In order to do so, it initially conducts a review regarding the most striking facts of the last century, at a global and national level, especially the totalitarian regimes in Europe in sync with the Estado Novo (1937-1945) in Brazil, for relating them to the episode of the Brazilian military dictatorship. The Amnesty Law of 1979 (Law 6,683) is then presented, with an analysis of its social and legal significance in the political scenario of this period, the issues of responsibility and forgiveness, as well as the imposing characteristic of amnesty by the State, in particular, with respect to the oblivion of crimes against humanity committed by public agents against Brazilian citizens. Finally, the importance of political memory for the current democratic society is emphasized, it is defended as an essential political act that must occur within the public space for reducing the culture of silence regarding the dictatorship, this practice is revealed as a contribution to not forget the state of exception terrors and a prevention of its repetition. It shows that political amnesty can never be used as a maneuver for oblivion to prevail and for collective memory to be despised. It is argued that political memory belongs to the human relations world and must be understood as a phenomenon that is linked to a nation identity and, consequently, is a source of understanding for what we were, we are, and we will be, therefore, the memory is a matter of public character. |
