Adaptação e validação da versão brasileira da Escala Jefferson de Atitudes Relacionadas à Colaboração Interprofissional: um estudo em profissionais da atenção básica

• Ano de defesa: 2015
• Autor(a) principal: Abed, Marcelo Musa
• Orientador(a): Pereira, Edna Regina Silva
• Banca de defesa: Pereira, Edna Regina Silva, Menezes, Ida Helena Carvalho F., Rocha, Bárbara Souza
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Goiás
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-graduação em Ensino na Saúde (FM)
• Departamento: Faculdade de Medicina - FM (RG)
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Estudos de validação; Equipe de assistência ao paciente; Escalas; Questionários; Atenção primária à saúde
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Validation studies; Patient care team; Scales; Questionnaires; Primary health care
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CIENCIAS DA SAUDE
• Link de acesso: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/5479

Interprofessional collaboration is in the focal point of the transformation of the working process between professionals from various categories, in the quest to provide complete care to patients. Interprofessional education can ensure the cooperative practice in health services. That`s why tools are necessary to assess how this collaboration occurs. Hojat et al. drew up a scale for evaluating interprofessional collaboration. The aim of this study is the crosscultural adaptation and validation of the Jefferson Scale Of Attitudes Toward Trade Collaboration (JeffSATIC) on primary health care in Brazil. The final version, in Portuguese, of the Escala Jefferson de Atitudes Relacionadas à Colaboração Interprofissional (EJARCI), followed all the steps for its adaptation, ending with the evaluation by four experts of the translated content: cultural and conceptual equivalence in relation to its purpose and use in a sample of 30 primary health care professionals. One hundred and twenty-eight professionals of the health family team members participated in the validation process responding the translated scale. In the content validation the content validation index (CVI) was 0.99, which demonstrates that the scale is able to measure what it intend to. To appraise the internal consistency was used the Cronbach's alpha Coefficient, α value of 0.71, being acceptable to set their reliability. It is concluded that the cross-cultural adaptation has been properly performed and their application is valid in primary care.