Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2013 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Araújo, Cristina Batista de
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Sousa, Kátia Menezes de
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Gregolin, Maria do Rosário Valencise,
Morais, Mara Rúbia de Souza Rodrigues,
Costa, Alexandre Ferreira da,
Souza, Agostinho Potenciano de |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Goiás
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Letras e Linguística (FL)
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Letras - FL (RG)
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Espanhol: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/7654
|
Resumo: |
How have the school, Portuguese teaching and linguistics built their discourse on the subject and thus delineated subjectivities? Is there an ideal model or modes of existence that influenced and still influences school practices? What kind of subject is founded from the idea that power relations enroll subjects in social places, so its position will result in consequences /for others and for himself? How do linguistic-discursive processes of subjectivation of school subjects get, and how these requirements are expressed in documents, parameters, and other educational policies? It was from such questions that this study was designed, aiming to enter the universe of discourse to school, from it, to understand some of the practices of subjectivity resulting from the relationship between this universe and those that pervade. This study seeks, therefore, to understand, through the discursive approach, the construction of meaning and dialogue with the memory of expository discourses responsible for the production of subjectivities at school. It is known that society requires a certain school kind of man who is able to meet the demand of his time, and consequently, the school outlines subject from the government of others, putting aside the principles of self-care, favoring the creation of a man who watches and cares for each other, which protects the moral to the other. To comply with the objectives of defining subjectivity, we have combined the political management of the human species from scientific, legal categories etc., and the creation of body technologies, the disciplinary practices that orchestrate to regulate and evaluate what men do, what they say and what they are. According to the theoretical perspective of discourse analysis, French line, to handle the production of subjectivities and the relationship between knowledge and power, we must consider the world is constituted by discourse and everything, including subjects, are constituted by through discursive everyday practices. For this reason, research corpora are composed of statements which, in turn, are interwoven with others to endorse, reject, complement etc. what can or should be said in school discourse, without losing sight of the utterance, as constitutive of the enunciate function, assumes a position that also every individual can and should occupy to be his subject |
