Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2020 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Silva, Francielle Teodósio de Oliveira
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Rodrigues, Anderson de Brito
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Rodrigues, Anderson de Brito,
Rodrigues, Divino de Jesus da Silva,
Roure, Susie Amâncio Gonçalves de |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Goiás
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Psicologia (FE)
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Educação - FE (RG)
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/10811
|
Resumo: |
This article aims to discuss the constitution of the Degree in Psychology in Brazil, between 1950 and 2017, through historical research. We seek to investigate how this field was formed in its historical and social characteristics. First, this research sought to present and discuss the legislation related to the institutionalization of Psychology in Brazil and its developments in the Psychology undergraduate area. Subsequently, this discussion focused on the analysis of academic productions that seek to discuss what was produced in relation to this field, through the journal Psicologia Ensino e Formação. After performing these steps, aspects of this area are presented, through categories found from the analysis of academic productions, which enabled the understanding of how the Psychology Degree was organized and thought in the field of teaching and training in psychology. This electronic device organizes productions that address this subject. This study is constructed by means of documentary analysis, bibliographic review performed on books, scientific articles, dissertations, theses, legislation related to Psychology graduation, in a global context. We understand that undergraduate psychology historically occupies a space in teaching, often confused with other areas of psychology, making it difficult to understand this field, both from the aspect of the psychology professor's performance and from the training itself. . Thus, this research allows us to discuss in which interests, conditions and commitment this area is being built. The research allowed us to understand that undergraduate psychology underwent several historical, political and social changes during its development, signaling challenges, commitments, practices, gaps and a greater need to strengthen the production of knowledge in this field. |
