Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2014 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Avelar, Rezende Bruno de
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Oliveira, Dijaci David de
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Oliveira, Dijaci David de,
Almeida, Luiz Mello de,
Nascimento, Pedro Francisco G. do,
Vianna, Cristina,
Braz, Camilo A. de |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Goiás
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Sociologia (FCS)
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Ciências Sociais - FCS (RG)
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/7455
|
Resumo: |
The segment lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) are among the various groups in the Brazilian social scene that suffer violations of their human rights and are more exposed / the situations of humiliation and violence. It is from this context that I propose to investigate and map the existing public security policies and aimed at LGBT in Brazil. Analyze the scope and limits of actions and public security policies for LGBT in the three spheres of government and the process of consolidation of these policies as a fundamental right of LGBT citizens. So it is necessary to identify the proposals of public safety for the LGBT segment, recorded in manifestation of privileged spaces of civil society, national LGBT Conferences (2008 and 2011), Guidelines of the First National Seminar on Public Security and Combat homophobia (2007), National Human Rights Program - PNDH-2 (2002) and PNDH-3 (2010), Brazil without homophobia Program (2008), National Plan for the Promotion of LGBT Citizenship and Human rights (2009), Reports SDH (Dial 100: 2011 and 2012), History and PLC Procedure 122 (2006-2014), LGBT Legislation: municipal and state to combat homophobia (1999-2014). To narrow the search opted for a qualitative approach and document analysis technique was used to collect data, to then identify the demands of the LGBT movement in the field of public security. With this technique were also analyzed the documents of federal, state and local governments to bring formalized in the proposed public safety demands for LGBT. And from the writings of several / the author / the social and legal sciences, as Arendt (2011), Spivak (2010), Appadurai (2009), Boudier (1989), Butler (2003), Arretche (2007), Sapori (2010), Protásio (2010), Raupp (2012), Adorno (2007), Appiah (2012) tried to analyze data on violence against LGBT, raised both by civil society and the government. The different actions and the set of 166 mapped legal frameworks that are in place are insufficient to cope with violence affecting victims and make women and LGBT men and there was no effective progress in the human rights field for the segment. What has been in the security field are generic policies for the entire population. Lack agility and serious political intentions in the discussions for the approval of laws that deal with justice for the segment, as proposed by the PLC 122, which aims to criminalize lgbtfobias. The lack of consistent public security policies is the result of a missing legislation, which does not have and does not respond to existing demands. The laws that exist are more illustrative that effective actually are palliative, so do not have the strength to support and ensure effectiveness of existing policies. The survey on these policies for LGBT showed that most of the laws comes from the state and municipal levels, a counterpoint revealing absence of the federal legislature. In several states the legal frameworks have been created for the promotion of LGBT rights, however, are very fragile, very localized and short range. These so many laws have failed rooting necessary to prevent serious violations of human rights of LGBT. |
