Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2022 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Silva, Gabriela Peixoto Vieira
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Gonçalves, Eliane
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Gonçalves, Eliane,
Sanchez, Beatriz Rodrigues,
Santos, Rayani Mariano dos,
Amaral, Marcela,
Sofiati, Flávio Munhoz |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Goiás
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Sociologia (FCS)
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Ciências Sociais - FCS (RMG)
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/12606
|
Resumo: |
New political formats of political representation have gained prominence in Brazil, especially since 2016. They are the representatives – sometimes spelled feminine, as in the cases studied in this research -, collective candidacies that are elected and will present an unprecedented way of sharing a legislative position, either in the chambers or in the legislative assemblies. Along with collective political mandates, a new configuration also presents itself, the entry of activism into politics, such as feminisms and LGBTTQIA+ movements. This is deeply focused on the interconnection of these two elements: the action of collective representatives from a solidary political dimension and the power to share this experience in the institutional spaces of feminists. In order to answer the question (among others): can solidarity be the fundamental axis that permeates the distribution of power?, I chose the following cases: Gabinetona (MG), Juntas (PE) and Mandata Ativista (SP) from of which, I investigate their potential impacts on legislative houses with the presence of corporeities that generally do not ascend to these places. The analysis is based on contemporary feminist social theory in dialogue with some epistemological perspectives of the Social Sciences, predominantly contemporary, in order to relate central categories such as democracy, participation, representation, feminist praxis, solidarity and conflict. The investigation, using qualitative methodology, was developed from various field procedures - observation in focus of the co-parliamentaries' activities, monitoring of activities on online platforms and focused interviews with some of the co-parliamentarians in the period 2019-2021 published on websites. The face-to-face (2019) and remote (2021) interviews were recorded and transcribed for later. Among the conclusions that the study allows, I emphasize that, although conflicts are inevitable in plural coexistence within the scope of political institutions in concrete reinvention for a reinvention of collective policies. Whether or not to use the word solidarity, the co-parliamentarians emphasize their bonds of appreciation for social justice, united by a common social struggle. |
