Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2024 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Jesus, Simone Aparecida de
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Chaves, Juliana de Castro
,
Chaves |
| Banca de defesa: |
Chaves, Juliana de Castro,
Resende, Anita Cristina Azevedo,
Faria, Gina Glaydes Guimarães de,
Vaz, Alexandre Fernandez,
Silva, Pedro Fernando da |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Goiás
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Educação (FE)
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Educação - FE (RMG)
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Espanhol: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/13767
|
Resumo: |
Linked to the research line "Fundamentals of Educational Processes" at the Faculty of Education, Federal University of Goiás, this study aims to uncover the rationale behind Literature in the regulatory documents guiding education in Brazil and Goiás, specifically concerning the early years of Elementary Education. The central question addressed is: What is the rationale for Literature in the documents that guide education in the early years of Elementary Education? This is a bibliographic and documentary research study that considers as primary sources the guides "História e Histórias" (2001b) and the second volume of "PNBE na Escola: Literatura Fora da Caixa" (PNBE) (2014) from the National School Library Program (PNBE); the National Common Curricular Base (NCB) (2018); the Curricular Guidelines for Goiás (CGG) (2019); and the Reading, Writing, and Interpretation in Literacy (2021) books from the Alfamais Goiás Program. The theoretical references include, among others, Antônio Cândido, Theodor Adorno, Walter Benjamin, Herbert Marcuse, and Karl Marx. The study reveals that academic research investigating Literature highlights its relationship with Brazilian schools since their inception, often leaning toward an instrumentalized perspective, treating Literature as a model for language or a source of information. However, our analyses demonstrate two distinct perspectives in the current documents reviewed. Literature is approached both as a means of human development and as an instrumentalized tool. Notably, the document with the most intense instrumentalization is also the one closest to students, specifically the LEIA books, used by teachers and students in Goiás municipalities. Consequently, the study concludes that it is essential to reflect on how these documents address Literature, as a narrowing of focus becomes more pronounced in localized documents compared to national ones. It proposes the perspective of critical theory as an alternative, viewing Literature as an art form capable of fostering human development and considering it as an incompressive asset. |
