Design Sprint como ferramenta de apoio ao empreendedorismo e à inovação

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2021
Autor(a) principal: Barros Neto, Wagner de lattes
Orientador(a): Soares, Júlio Cesar Valandro lattes
Banca de defesa: Bevilacqua, Sólon, Francisco, Roberto da Piedade, Soares, Júlio Cesar Valandro
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Goiás
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-graduação em Engenharia de Produção (FCT)
Departamento: Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia - FCT (RG)
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/11466
Resumo: Studies on the business death rate reveal some factors that most cause companies to fail: not delivering the right product to the market and taking too long to develop it. Several methodologies have emerged to support innovation processes and agile development of products, seeking to support teams to test, develop and launch their ideas with greater chances of success. Among them, there is the Design Sprint, a method created within Google, which this dissertation aimed to analyze the effectiveness as a tool to support innovation and entrepreneurship. For that, two action researches were carried out, applying the method in two startups and evaluating the process and its result. Then, a survey was carried out with organizations from 21 countries that adopted the Design Sprint in the creation or improvement of products, services, strategies and processes, evaluating the impacts perceived in terms of time and money savings, as well as impacts on the team, innovation, product and financial. The survey results showed that the method was beneficial for different types of organizations to have more aligned teams, better products, more agile innovation processes and reduced commercial and operational costs. The survey revealed that organizations that applied Design Sprint achieved an average time savings of 2.1 months, with a return of investment on time of more than 10.5 times. The method demonstrated the ability to support companies in different contexts and objectives, and should in fact be analyzed as a possible tool to support innovation processes and development of solutions.