Reflexões sobre o “fazer histórico”: uma história da historiografia em (sobre) Goiás (da década de 1920 à de 1990)

• Ano de defesa: 2015
• Autor(a) principal: Silva, Rogério Chaves da
• Orientador(a): Silva, Luiz Sérgio Duarte da
• Banca de defesa: Silva, Luiz Sérgio Duarte da, Martins, Estevão Chaves de Rezende, Oliveira, Eliézer Cardoso de, Sandes, Noé Freire, Freitas, Lena Castello Branco Ferreira de
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Goiás
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-graduação em História (FH)
• Departamento: Faculdade de História - FH (RG)
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: História da historiografia; Teoria da história; Historiografia regional; História de Goiás
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: History of historiography; Theory of history; Regional historiography; History of Goiás
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CIENCIAS HUMANAS::HISTORIA
• Link de acesso: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/8030

This research consists in a History of Historiography work, aimed at the analysis of the regional production of historiography developed in (about) Goiás from 1920 to 1990. Thus, we investigated texts of regional historiography which were dedicated to the study of issues related to the history of Goiás, therefore, we analyzed the production contexts, the influences, and the theoretical trends, the research methods, besides some narrative and normative aspects involving the historical knowledge produced about the region’s past. It was found that the history of this regional historiography of the nineteenth century can be considered from two distinct periods, each with its distinctive historiographical model: the first, originating from the writing “self-taught historians” whose historical researches have shaped the regional historiography from the early decades of the twentieth century until the 1960s; and the second, consisting of historical researches produced by researchers linked to the university, trainers of a post-1970 academic historiography. Therefore, we tried to confront these different modes of apprehension of past phenomena, and, at the same time, mark the normative, theoretical, methodological, empirical and narrative specificities contained in these two historiographical archetypes.