Interpretação crítica do direito de propriedade imobiliária agrária a partir da filosofia da libertação de Enrique Dussel e do novo constitucionalismo latino-americano

• Ano de defesa: 2012
• Autor(a) principal: Freitas , Vitor Sousa
• Orientador(a): Gonçalves Neto , João da Cruz
• Banca de defesa: Gonçalves Neto, João da Cruz, Souza Filho, Carlos Frederico Marés de, Wolkmer, Antonio Carlos
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Goiás
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-graduação em Direito Agrário (FD)
• Departamento: Faculdade de Direito - FD (RG)
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Direito agrário; Propriedade imobiliária agrária; Hermenêutica constitucional; Filosofia da libertação; Novo constitucionalismo latino-americano
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Agrarian law; Agrarian property; Constitutional hermeneutics; Philosophy of liberation; Latin-american new constitutionalism
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO
• Link de acesso: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/3539

The theme of this master thesis is the interpretation of the agrarian property, from constitutionalized legal grounds, based on the Philosophy of Liberation hermeneutic proposal developed by the philosopher Enrique Dussel and on the changes in the agrarian property caused by the Latin-American New Constitutionalism. The work aims to provide new foundations for the study of agrarian law, in a context of paradigmatic crisis, through the development of new theoretical models that rearticulate legal thought before institutional transformations. The research is theoretical and it is based primarily in the works of Dussel, and in the constitutions of Venezuela, Ecuador and Bolivia. It can be concluded, according to Dussel, that praxis is the foundation and condition to the understanding of subjects in community and that linguisticity, instrumentality, historicity and intersubjectivity are articulated in the necessarily intentional and projective constitution sense, in view of, ultimately, the care of specific needs of the subjects living in community. Law is constituted in the praxis of subjects such as mediation institutionalized by power to satisfy those needs in everyday life and in multiple fields of existence. The Philosophy of Liberation, in turn, worries about the situation of domination, victimization, denial of rights, alienation that precludes the exercise of authentic interpretation, non participation in the institutionalization of law and its meaning as well as the instrumentalization of the interpreter for strange understanding that are negativ to their needs. In this sense, the modern property is interpreted in itseconomic, ecological, cultural, legal and geopolitical negativity, from the revelation of the mechanisms that make it servesto a project that denies the dignity of nature and human work for the benefit of a economic world system that pressuposes and asserts itself with the generation of systemic poverty, non-central countries dependency in the world-system, environmental and cultural destruction, and denial of rights. The crisis of this world system opens new institutional possibilities and demands the affirmation of new projects for Latin American peoples, with the consequent need for statement of rights. In this context, the Latin-American Transformative Constitutionalism faces the issue of access to land and denies the negativity of modern agrarian property in its various dimensions, through his transformation, and in view of new rights. This positivity from the victimsconstitute new foundations for the legal use of the land and transform the agrarian property models of interpretation.