Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2018 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Gonçalves, Bruna Angélica
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Pinto, Joana Plaza
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Pinto, Joana Plaza,
Oliveira, Hélvio Frank de,
Nascimento, André Marques do |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Goiás
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Letras e Linguística (FL)
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Letras - FL (RG)
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/8828
|
Resumo: |
The literacy theme is constitute by extreme complexity and disagreement with regard to the discussions related to this theme. More than just a phenomenon related to the uses of writing, it constitutes as the main element of the trajectories of individuals, revealing the rich meanings that can be attributed to the most diverse uses of language. Thus, like all that is social in nature, literacies are permeated with the dynamics of power relations, being subject to hierarchies depending on where and by whom they are produced and / or analyzed. Bearing all this in mind and based on discussions so far raised in the literature of literacies, this research aims to describe the current state of the art studies of literacies developed outside the school agency; as well as compare perspectives developed in these studies with social literacy proposals and evaluate the impact of social literacy approaches in the studies described. To that end, the theoretical basis remains in the field of current critical studies on literacy from sociocultural perspectives, among them (STREET, 2003, 2014, TERRA, 2013) in interlocution with decolonial studies (SANTOS & MENESES, 2009; QUIJANO , MIGNOLO, 2003, 2014, NASCIMENTO, 2014) and critical studies of Modernity (MAKONI & PENNYCOOK, 2007). The concept of bibliographic research serves as a reference in that it has been made the survey of the references already published, in order to know, in a general way, what has already been studied on the subject (FONSECA, 2002). The corpus of the research, composed of 142 articles published in Portuguese between 1997 and 2016, was generated from searches in the Scielo and Capes’ Periodics Portal in the month of March 2017 taking as reference a pre-established criterion according to the objectives of the research. The discussions about the literacies were then less anchored to the very fields in which they are developed, and much more linked to already crystallized and hegemonic discourses. As shown, the theoretical framework in these last two decades has not changed much, and new discussions are not being highlighted. We continue to speak of literacies from geopolitically marked places as institutional spaces described by hegemonic voices. About literacies much remains to be discussed. Two decades of studies in Brazil have not been able to capture the complexity that surrounds this subject. We must construct our perceptions about the uses of language by people, forgetting simplistic conceptions, starting with the understanding of literacies, starting from the trajectories of the subjects by which they are produced. |
