Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2015 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Soares, Hugo Henry Martins de Assis
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Tavares, Francisco Mata Machado
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Tavares, Francisco Mata Machado,
Ferreira, Denise Paiva,
Marona, Marjorie Correa |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Goiás
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciência Politica (FCS)
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Ciências Sociais - FCS (RMG)
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/13395
|
Resumo: |
Recent theme in Brazilian political debates refers to a possible constitutional crisis, specifically between the legislative and judicial branches, with interference in the duties of each, in which, citing as an example, the Proposed Constitutional Amendment n. 33/2011, while attempting to limitation of the functions granted to the Federal Supreme Court (STF). The question is in practice increasingly commonplace lead to the decision of the Judiciary certain polemical and controversial issues in Brazilian society. The core of the discussion permeates the interpretation of the Constitution, questioning judicial supremacy regarding its interpretation and application, or if there is the possibility of expansion to other political actors, without causing the loss of normative weight. Within the broader role of the judiciary in national political decision making process is what the literature meant for judicialization of politics. This concept brings the political role of the judiciary, to claim the effectiveness of fundamental rights and guarantees, contributing to the implementation of essential fundamental precepts of democracy. It is intended in this study to examine the possible relationship between the judicialization of politics with the initiation of PEC n. 33/2011 and its subsequent approval by the Commission of Constitution and Justice and Citizenship, which will be trying to understand the relationship mainly through interviews with parliamentarians involved in PEC n. 33/2011 proposition and rapporteur, along with those present at the session of the Committee on Constitution, Justice and Citizenship upon approval of said PEC. |
