Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2018 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Aguiar, Heloíse Cardoso da Silva
 |
Orientador(a): |
Palacios, José Gonzalo Armijos
 |
Banca de defesa: |
Palacios, José Gonzalo Armijos,
Matos Júnior, Fábio Amorim de,
Seneda, Marcos César |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Goiás
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Filosofia (FAFIL)
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Filosofia - FAFIL (RG)
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/8905
|
Resumo: |
In Plato's Republic books II and III, Plato examines the poets' methods and their effects before the public, and in doing so concludes that they are not compatible with his educational goal, as they oppose his ethical conception and political project. However, when we read the poem Works and Days, we find a discourse that seeks to ground human action in an absolute conception of justice. And precisely because of this, it provides an important background for the construction of the conception of justice present in the Republic. Hence, this dissertation intends to establish parallelisms between the conception of justice of the poet Hesiod and the one Plato presents in the Republic with the objective of determining if, in fact, the poet's conception is so opposed to that of the philosopher as he presents it in the mentioned dialogue. |