DISCURSO PEDAGÓGICO E DISCURSO UNIVERSITÁRIO: UMA APROXIMAÇÃO

• Ano de defesa: 2008
• Autor(a) principal: RIBEIRO, Pollyanna Rosa
• Orientador(a): BURGARELLI, Cristóvão Giovani
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Goiás
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Mestrado em Educação
• Departamento: Ciências Humanas
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: discurso pedagógico; discurso universitário e subjetividade.; 1.Educação 2. Discurso pedagógico 4. Discurso universitário 5. Subjetividade
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: pedagogical discourse; university discourse and subjectivity
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO
• Link de acesso: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tde/2001

This dissertation belongs to the research field of Educational Processes and Culture in the Education Post-Graduate Program at UFG. It aims to outline a debate between pedagogical and university discourses, because their discursive functioning has implications for day-to-day academic activity. Because they do not have their origins in works of a same author nor in the same theoretical vein, the debate presented herein sets out to clarify the characteristics of each discourse; firstly, with regard to Orlandi s study on pedagogical discourse and then, to Lacan s university discourse. Pedagogical discourse presents a circular working based on scientificity found in other fields, especially in Psychology. Thus the way in which it operates in the school can be called (psycho)pedagogy, since it reduces theorization to techniques made available and in the name of constant updating. After describing the working of one of Lacan s four discourses, starting from a study of the mathema, it was possible to see that some characteristics of pedagogical discourse are in consonance with university discourse. In the formula of this discourse, the knowledge derived from science occupies a dominant position, places the students in the place of the object and produces a thesis, always referring to the name of an author. Of the converging points between the discourses which are the theme of this study, one can highlight the present configuration of science, that is: technoscience, which is presented as a foundation for these discursive modes, benefiting not just the manner in which the school operates but also the different social institutions. Using a psychoanalytic approach as its principal focus, this study emphasizes the conception of discourse as a structure which promotes social bonding and, consequently, constitutes its subjects. This is the reason for the emphasis placed here on the discourses which lay the foundation for the school, as they produce and shape subjectivity.