O subcampo brasileiro de pesquisa em ensino de ciências CTS (Ciência-Tecnologia-Sociedade): um espaço em construção

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2015
Autor(a) principal: Ribeiro, Thiago Vasconcelos lattes
Orientador(a): Genovese, Luiz Gonzaga Roversi lattes
Banca de defesa: Genovese, Luiz Gonzaga Roversi, Carvalho, Washington Luiz Pacheco de, Oliveira, João Ferreira de
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Goiás
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-graduação em Educação em Ciências e Matemática (PRPG)
Departamento: Pró-Reitoria de Pós-graduação (PRPG)
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/5572
Resumo: The dissertation “The Subfield Brazilian Research in Science Education STS (SCIENCETECHNOLOGY- SOCIETY): a construction space” presents the results of an investigation that aimed to characterize the social space formed by researchers and institutions responsible for production and reproduction of research in science education STS in Brazil. To build the object of research, we used the theoretical framework involving the notion of field, developed by the French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu, synthesized in central concepts such as field, symbolic capital, habitus, illusio, symbolic violence, etc. In the construction of the methodology and analysis used was the Bardin’s Analysis of Content, updated to the way of thinking relational characteristic of implicit praxiological knowledge the notion of field in the form of a Relational Content Analysis. Data were built with originating from the information provided by the agents involved in the research in science education STS in Lattes Platform, through the Curriculum Lattes of each. The analyzes produced allowed signal to the existence of a form of symbolic market of cultural production, a scientific field involving the dispute of symbolic capital, about a hierarchy of positions that characterize and differentiate the dominant researchers and researchers dominated in the structure of symbolic struggles of research in science education STS. The analyzes allowed, yet, show some effects of symbolic violence by ruling on the Subfield Brazilian Research in Science Education STS.