Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2012 |
Autor(a) principal: |
ALVES, Marcos Francisco
![lattes](/bdtd/themes/bdtd/images/lattes.gif?_=1676566308) |
Orientador(a): |
ALENCAR, Maria Amélia Garcia de
![lattes](/bdtd/themes/bdtd/images/lattes.gif?_=1676566308) |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Goiás
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Mestrado em História
|
Departamento: |
Ciências Humanas
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tde/2333
|
Resumo: |
By comparing the two authors of literary conception, Bernardo Guimarães and Joaquim Manuel de Macedo on slavery/abolition, this work aims to discuss the abolitionist debates of the late nineteenth century and its representations of the slave. It attempts to show how the literary representation of slavery appears in the work of two writers and how it dialogues with the debates of the abolitionist period. The dissertation conceives the two authors as the "novelists of Abolition", analyzes the abolitionist discourse and how the slave is represented in the novels A Escrava Isaura and Uma história de quilombolas (Bernardo Guimarães) and As vítimas algozes: quadros da escravidão (Joaquim Manuel de Macedo). Both Bernardo Guimarães and Joaquim Manuel de Macedo romanticized the slave life, calling for the abolition, but their ideas have profound differences. Comparing and contrasting ideas present in the novels, we will examine the figure of the slave and abolitionist debate, dialogue with the context in which these works were written: the long process for the abolition of slavery in Brazil. |