A genealogia de um mestrado em saúde coletiva

• Ano de defesa: 2007
• Autor(a) principal: Silva, Roberta Scaramussa
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo; BR; Mestrado em Psicologia; UFES; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia
• Palavras-chave em Português: Public health; Colective health; Formation; Professional practice in health; Prática profissional em saúde; Formação; Saúde pública x Estudo e ensino - Brasil; Saúde pública x Pesquisa - Brasil; Psicologia; 159.9
• Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/3088

In Brazil, the Public Health policies were, until half of the 20th century, characterized by clientlism practices, based on a model of sanitary campaigns, in which it was adopted a repressive disciplinary style of medical intervention on the bodies, both individual and social. After 1960 is noted an intense popular movement searching for changes in different social areas to implement actions resisting the instituted powers. Among those, the attempts for effective transformations in the Health area, in favor of a reform that would overpower the biologic, curative and assistencialist model that existed, having its peak on the decade of 1980, with the Sanitary Reform. The recent movement, called Colective Health appears in this context to breach the speech- practical supported by the hegemonic model of Public Health. This field of theory and practice is committed with the entry of Social Sciences in the Health Science, with the widening of the health concept and with the autonomy of the subjects involved in the process, rescuing the meanings of politics and public lost so long ago. Based on that, was the objective to develop a genealogic evaluation of the Program of Master degree in Colective Health of UFES, based on the speech of its students that were currently working in the public health services. Were interviewed eight students. The interviews were taped, transcribed and discussed based on the Speech Analysis. The speech was organized according to three more recurrent themes: the undergraduate formation, the professional practice on the public service and the formation on the Master’s Program. The genealogy of the speech produced by the students showed a permanent shock of forces in which the students stated the processuality (ethical meaning) or, in the contrary, the denial of it through the imposition of the knowledge (moral meaning). In a general way, in the field of the production of knowledge, either in the undergraduate formation or in that Master program, there was the predominance of heteronomous practices (moral). The incorporation of the knowledge to the logic of the market leads to the making of workers that follow the demands of the capitalism, increasing the non commitment with a critic and inventive learning. The speech evidences the separation between the academic contents and the practice on the public health services, reveling itself in dissatisfaction with the practice and the belief that the permanent formation might lead to the answers of the challenges imposed by the everyday job. Referring to the professional practice, the collective production does not happen, the knowledge of the other (either the coworker or the client of the health system) is constantly denied or ignored. The multiprofessional practice exists much more as something imposed by the necessity of coping with the complexity among the fragmentation of the knowledge. Even with that, thought less evident, in some moments it’s possible to see some attempts of breaking through with the instituted forms. Even thought it does not appear as an ethical ways of being, it opens an important place to the emerging of new ways to think and make health.