A contradição entre as súmulas vinculantes n° 20, 34, 37 e 51 à luz da teoria dos precedentes

• Ano de defesa: 2019
• Autor(a) principal: Araujo, Maria Clara Queiroz
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo; BR; Mestrado em Direito Processual; Centro de Ciências Jurídicas e Econômicas; UFES; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito Processual
• Palavras-chave em Português: Binding Precedent; Contradiction; Understanding; Interpretation; Application; Coherence; Stability; Integrity; Isonomy; Legal certainty; Ratio decidendi; Stare decisis; Súmulas vinculantes; Interpretação; Aplicação; Coerência; Integridade; Isonomia; Segurança Jurídica; Compreensão; Estabilidade; Súmula vinculante; Precedentes judiciais; Contradição; Direito constitucional; Direito Processual Civil; 340
• Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/11189

The present study intends to analyze the incompatibility between the rationes decidendi of Brazilian Supreme Court’s precedents nºs 20, 34 and 51 when compared with the ratio decidendi of the precedent nº 37. Therefore, in the first chapter, it will be fixed the premises of legal understanding, interpretation and application, aiming to define the theoretical basis within philosophical hermeneutics, and to operate the bond with legal hermeneutics in order to obtain subsidies for the analysis of the pointed contradiction. In chapter two, it’s presented the historical evolution of precedents in common law and civil law traditions and its influence on Brazilian law, as well as the characteristics of the precedent system adopted in Brazil, indicating the main concepts (ratio decidendi, obter dictum, stare decisis), the legal obligations of stability, coherence and integrity established in the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure and the application methods of precedents (distinguishing and overruling) will be examined. In the end, the inconsistency between the rationes decidendi of the indicated Brazilian Supreme Court’s precedents will be looked into under the principles of isonomy and of legal certainty, bringing the analysis of recent Brazilian Supreme Court judgments, with incoherent application or distinguish of the precedents.