Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2018 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Miranda, Victor Vasconcelos
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Alvim, Eduardo Arruda |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/21379
|
Resumo: |
This work aims to analyze the formation process of the ratio decidendi, as well as its applicability in Brazilian's civil procedural law from the introduction of the binding judicial precedents system fixed in the CPC/2015. The core of this study is focused on the construction of the ratio decidendi, through the establishment of its meaning in Brazilian law, as well as the settlement of parameters which we understand as necessary to its construction. In order to do this, we introduced the structuring vectors of the formation of the ratio decidendi. It is made, from these chosen vectors, a review of the leading opinion of the judgment and the decision-making process, in order to highlight the prominence of a dialogal and convergent relation between the argument of the judges to the establishment of a universalizable decision pattern. It has also analyzed the guidance of the courts in the delimitation of the ratio decidendi and the continuous process of redefinition of the ratio decidendi's incidence field and even its content. Furthermore, it has examined the problem of 'summarysme' in Brazilian law and how it is impossible to understand the complete spectrum of operation of the ratio decidendi based only on the summary. Finally, we have highlighted the operational dynamics of judicial precedents, analyzing the application process of the precedent through a dialogical relation between the litigants and the judge, with the intensification of the judgment recital in the analytical -rather than merely syllogistic or reductionist- use of the precedents system |
