Turismo em Guarapari (ES): lógica de uso e ocupação do espaço incorporando simbolismos e identidade cultural

• Ano de defesa: 2016
• Autor(a) principal: Pires, Mariana Rodrigues
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo; BR; Mestrado em Geografia; UFES; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geografia
• Palavras-chave em Português: Use and occupation of space; Culture; Cultural identity; Tourism; Identidade cultural; Uso e ocupação do espaço; Turismo - Guarapari (ES); Cultura; Espaço em geografia; Geografia; 91
• Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/9321

Seeks to understand what logic and appropriation mechanisms places by the state and capital for the do and the tourist consumption, as well as the contradictions of tourism in the city of Guarapari (ES) associated with the use and occupation of that space. This is relevant to the elucidation of tourism contradictions in Guarapari, as well as the existing socio-spatial conflicts in the places where the activity takes place, because the littoral is outstandingly attractive for public and private investments, having the leisure and tourism as the attraction activities and polarization of these investments (projects, equipment and services). Thus, the space consumed by tourism exceptionality does not occur anywhere, but is associated with the seafront – both on the symbolic level as material. Dares to say that the study is based on the fecund perspective of historical materialism for tourism analysis and for that, as instruments that supported the study, it use the exploratory methodology and the empirical research in the city. Thus, the exceptional space consumed by tourism doesn’t occur anywhere, but is associated with the seafront – both on the symbolic level as material. Dares to say that the study is based on the fruitful perspective of historical materialism for tourism analysis and for that, as instruments that supported the study, it was used the exploratory methodology and empirical research in the city. As noted, it is not because of the natural “amenities” not even because these are places of live and work close to the beaches that the coastal places in Guarapari were appropriated by tourism, but because these places are conducive to extraction of profits by the capital and for the reproduction of social relations. They are places favorable for the consumption of some facts of culture and cultural identity capixaba that were raised to the category of products more to ensure that any monopoly rents that cultural valorization of people and places. In the consumer society there is only room for business, products and services. It creates a culture and a cultural identity that can be offered for sale, reduced to some “easily noticeable characteristics” that become “attractive”, tourism products and services linked to portions of the space selected for use and consumption by tourism. Thus, space of complexity between work and tourism (leisure), formality and informality, production and consumption, every day and fleetingness, reproduction of capital and maintenance of the life, the littoral of Guarapari has a given reality according to the conveniences and problems that were forced its. In the game of interests, there are those that only want profits, that only want to sell their labor force, that only want to live in the place and that only want to going find the leisure, there are various forms of conflicts, socio-cultural pressures and forces that need to be revealed and analyzed.