Do significante à língua (que faz cócegas): o que faz o sujeito falar?

• Ano de defesa: 2023
• Autor(a) principal: Machado, Gabriela Morais
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo; BR; Mestrado em Psicologia Institucional; Centro de Ciências Humanas e Naturais; UFES; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia Institucional
• Palavras-chave em Português: Psicanálise; Voz; Pulsão; Gozo; Psicologia
• Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/12597

From the question, «what makes the Subject speak ?», this dissertation discusses the importance of the voice and the motherese to the acquisition of speech and subjective constitution. Based on a reading of Freud, re-laced under the Lacaninan orientation, the Subject is considered to emerge from the encounter of the organism with the signifier and its effects, which also constitutes the body. In that regard, the acquisition of speech is considered within the joint between body and language, so as the operations that lead to the constitution of the Subject and the Unconscious. From this perspective, the voice occupies a privileged function as one of the ways to introduce the baby to language, and the speech of the maternal agent function as an invocation to establish a bond, so as the anticipation, on the baby, of a speaker and a Subject. The first chapter presents an investigation around the incidences of the voice in the Freudian metapsychology, articulating the aspects of the Subject’s speech towards the body, up to the limit of representation through words. This enhances untranslatable remains on the foundation of the psychic apparatus, which points to the distinction of Super-Ego. The second chapter debates the specific definition of the voice in psychoanalysis, according to Jacques Lacan, to contemporary psychoanalysts who contribute to this topic’s discussion. Thus, the voice is related to the Invocative Drive, also in the signifier’s borderline. Articulating voice and motherese prosody, two aspects are presented: the Drive’s repression and also its insistence as jouissance, attesting to the impossibility of vocalizing/verbalizing everything. On the third chapter, some presentations of this impossibility in the civilization are discussed; that seems to point out a certain tension between the Subject’s singularity and the plurality of the voices that make up social bonds. Therefore, this discussion around the voice in psychoanalysis navigates a political dimension, related to parental roles, infancy and education.