Problematizações do currículo-experiência no entre-lugar da educação infantil e do ensino fundamental : possíveis contribuições para o ensino fundamental de nove anos
Ano de defesa: | 2014 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo
BR Doutorado em Educação Centro de Educação UFES Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação |
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Link de acesso: | http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/1226 |
Resumo: | This text is an invitation to discuss some permeations brought to schools as the nine-year-long Elementary School was deployed and implemented. As a government’s policy, it reorganizes school’s spacetimes, imposes a prescript curriculum, and an objective-driven assessment, and calls into question what it means to be a child and to live the childhood in school. As main objective, it aims at problematizing the deployment and implementation of the nine-year-long Elementary School within the city of Vitória (in Espírito Santo, Brazil) and its implications within the Kindergarten and Elementay School’s inbetweeness. It was necessary to be within school’s everyday, living it, feeling it, and talking to the practicing subjects – the childrenstudents, the teachers, and the pedagogues – to do so. Hence, three movements were made. The first one consisted of documental data collection (of notions, laws, both national and municipal guidelines that deploy the compulsory nine-year-long Elementary School). The second movement comprised the analysis of some papers published by four of the National Post-Graduation of Education Research Association’s theme groups which regard the “Nine-year-long Elementary School” theme, and of texts found in schools that are organized by the Education Ministry. The third movement consisted of the research conducted within a Municipal Kindergarten School (MKS) and within a Municipal Elementary School (MES) in Vitória, throughout the years of 2011 and 2012, where it was possible to talk to childrenstudents of two classes of the first year, to the teachers and to the pedagogues. It uses the theoretical and methodological contribution of researches in/of/with quotidian (CERTEAU 1994; ALVES 2001; FERRAÇO, 2003), which made it possible for us to frame different research instruments, such as the field journal (an important resource on the attempt to capture movements, speeches and expressions), the conversations (as an attempt to approach the subjects in order to do with), and the literature workshops (as a device of creation and production of other ways of thinking the child and the childhood). As we attempted to question the place of the child within the nine-year-long Elementary School, Deleuze’s becoming-child concept (1997) helped thinking of the child’s movement as a powerful presence which produces other prettier and more intense ways of life within school and curriculum. The in-betweeness concept (Bhabha, 2007) strengthens the discussions between the MKS and MES as spacetimes of negotiations. Kohan’s discussions (2003) bring up the place of the childhood that does not relate to a chronological time, but thinks of a meeting with childhood, with the childhood experience. And Larrosa (2004) helps us with the concept of experience as we think of an experience-curriculum as the one that is not located on the prescript document, nor within the spacetimes of Kindergarten or Elementary School, or on the child, but within the composition of the school, the children, and the childhoods, and the is only possible on the meeting with the child within ourselves |