Comparação de métodos de extração de fósforo disponível em solos do semiárido

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2020
Autor(a) principal: Medeiros, Maria Deuzilene Oliveira do Nascimento
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
Brasil
Centro de Ciências Agrárias - CCA
UFERSA
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Manejo de Solo e Água
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufersa.edu.br/handle/prefix/5666
Resumo: The Mehlich-1 method is the most used in Brazil to extract phosphorus (P) available in the soil. Based on the hypothesis of loss of the predictive capacity of this extractant in alkaline soils, the Mehlich-1, Olsen and ion exchange resin methods were compared in samples of ten representative soils from the Brazil’s semi-arid region, between the Piranhas-Açu (RN) and Jaguaribe (CE) valleys, with soil pH ranging from 4.1 to 8.0. The soil samples received four doses of P according to their phosphorus buffer capacity (PBC) and were incubated for 30 days. The treatments were distributed in randomized blocks, in a 10 × 4 factorial arrangement, with ten soils and four doses of phosphorus, with three replications. Each experimental unit consisted of a plastic pot containing 3.0 dm³ of soil, where two corn plants were grown for 31 days in a greenhouse. The P extracted by the methods was correlated with the P accumulated in the aerial part of the corn plants. The mixed resin and Olsen methods had the best correlations with the accumulated P in the plants, regardless of the pH and the PBC of the soils. The acidity depletion in Mehlich-1 extracts was significant in alkaline soils, with a high CaCO3 equivalent content. Mehlich-1 was suitable in acidic and low PBC soils, but in soils with higher pH and Ca2+ content, this extractant may overestimate the P available in soils naturally rich in P-Ca or underestimate the P available in soils rich in CaCO3