A abstrativização do controle concreto de constitucionalidade e os excessos do STF

• Ano de defesa: 2010
• Autor(a) principal: Ferreira, Emanuel de Melo
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Palavras-chave em Português: Controle de constitucionalidade; STF; Controle abstrato; Excessos; Súmula vinculante
• Link de acesso: http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/12548

The judicial review is the activity carried out to verify the vertical compatibility of the laws and normative acts in face of the Constitution, being a consequence of its formal supremacy. The brasilian judicial review exercised by the Supreme Court is changing, and that Court has committed some excesses while developing those breakthroughs. The first refers to the unconstitutional binding precedent, and the second to the unconstitutional mutation. In this research, was said that if a binding precedent has been edited according with the constitutional rules, there is no violation to the principle of separation of powers. If those rules aren’t observed, however, the binding precedent edited is inconstitutional, and the Legislative Power must act to guarantee its jurisdiction in face of the Judiciary. The constitutional mutations are these informal changing in the meaning of the constitutional norms, without any alteration in the constitutional text. When these mutations violate that text, occur an unconstitutional mutation, like that one announced by Judges Gilmar Mendes and Eros Grau, referring to the Federal Senate role in the judicial review.