Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2016 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Lopes, Antonio Juliano Ferreira |
| Orientador(a): |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/19711
|
Resumo: |
The philosopher Søren Aabye Kierkegaard will speak in Fear and Trembling, work of the 1943, regarding the issue of act of faith and its existential implications embodied in the biblical account of Genesis, but specifically in the task imposed on Abraham, as him is considered by the author as the authentic knight of faith, given the seriousness with which experienced in its fullness, what the philosopher would name of the paradox of faith. Those who live this paradox would be in a state of suspension of morality. This can be explained in part by the incomprehensibility condition in which is the knight of faith, to those who were still in the moral sphere. The purpose of this dissertation is to examine the grounds that justifying the existential condition of the knight of faith and his relation to the concept of paradox in Kierkegaard and his break with the field of objective morality, and inquire whether he could become understandable by others, taking into consideration the specificity of incomprehensibility so belonging whom were within the religious existential domain and the two domains pointed ethics: the regulatory moral, of generic and social matrix and the we call here of absolute Ethics, based exclusively on the man-God relationship. For this purpose not limit ourselves to the work mentioned, but we going to immerse in the analysis of other key works of the Danish philosopher, so that we can also define and expose the boundaries between these two ethical areas, namely, the general moral and the religious duty, and to see if in Kierkegaard is possible to think of a conciliation of both or in a reciprocal rejection. |
