Resistência a azólicos em candida spp. de origem veterinária : um fenômeno mediado por bombas de efluxo

• Ano de defesa: 2011
• Autor(a) principal: Maia, Débora Castelo Branco de Souza Collares
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Palavras-chave em Português: Candida; Biofilmes; Prometazina
• Link de acesso: http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/5124

Monitoring of the antifungal susceptibility of Candida species from veterinary sources is a recent practice and the mechanisms involved in antifungal resistance have not been completely elucidated. Considering that the antifungal arsenal is limited and that antifungal resistance has become more frequent, the comprehension of this phenomenon and the pursuit for therapeutic alternatives are necessary. Thus, the present work aimed at monitoring the in vitro susceptibility of Candida spp. isolated from animals, with emphasis on efflux pump-mediated azole resistance and on the evaluation of the effect of the imidazole levamisole on the growth of these yeasts. For such, in a first approach, 126 Candida isolates (19 C. albicans, 17 C. famata, 5 C. guilliermondii, 8 C. krusei, 29 C. parapsilosis, 48 C. tropicalis), out of which 22 were recovered from raptors, 32 from cactus parakeets, 56 from Amazon parrots, 7 from blue-and-gold macaws and 3 from a Brazilian porcupine. All isolates were submitted to broth microdilution test against amphotericin B, itraconazole and fluconazole, according to the methodology recommended by the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (document M27-A3). The MICs ranged from 0.03125 to 2 µg/mL, 0.125 to 250 µg/mL and 0.03125 to 125 µg/mL for amphotericin B, fluconazole and itraconazole, respectively. Out of 126 evaluated isolates, 33 (26.2%) were resistant to azoles, with 7 (5.6%) isolates resistant to fluconazole, 1 (0.8%) isolate resistant to itraconazole and 24 (19%) resistant to both drugs. In a second approach, all these azole resistant isolates, plus 20 C. albicans and 3 C. tropicalis that were recovered from our collection of resistant yeasts from veterinary sources, were submitted to the efflux pump inhibition assay with promethazine, with a total of 56 azole resistant isolates. Thus, MICs for fluconazole and itraconazole significantly reduced from 2 to 250 times for fluconazole and from 16 to 4000 times for itraconazole. The antifungal activity of levamisole against 12 C. albicans, 12 C. krusei, 12 C. parapsilosis and 12 C. tropicalis, was also evaluated, and MICs and minimum fungicidal concentrations varying from 0.58 to 2.34 mg/mL and from 2.34 to 9.37 mg/mL were obtained, respectively. Parallelly, it was demonstrated that levamisole significantly inhibits biofilm formation and interferes with the maintenance of mature biofilms. These data show that azole resistance is partially mediated by efflux-pumps and demonstrate the antifungal potential of the imidazole levamisole and its capacity of inhibiting the biofilm of strains of Candida spp. from animals.