Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2012 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Heck, Ralph Leal |
| Orientador(a): |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
www.teses.ufc.br
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/6566
|
Resumo: |
The present study is an attempt to articulate a discussion born out of the comparison between different interpretations of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Out of the problems that arise, this study highlights the question of primacy of the logic dimension from the conception of fact. In other words, from the ideia of divisibility or indivisibility of the fact it’s possible to suppose that: either the ontological dimension gives logical structure to language, or it’s language that gives the reality a logical structure. This point of contention arises from the comparison between the commentators Marrill B. Hintikka, Jaakko Hintikka, Hans-Johan Glock, P.M.S. Hacker e Donald Peterson. Once estabilished these reading parallels, I resort to the attempt of elaborating an exit to this question involving two stages: a reading of the main concepts involved in the problem and Wittgenstein’s possible answers to this question of primacy. Which leads indeed to a elimination of this possibility of primacy when considering the Tractatus own terms. |
