Crise do capital e a utilização do fundo público: a continuidade das orientações do Banco Mundial às políticas de seguridade social nos governos de FHC, Lula e Dilma

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2015
Autor(a) principal: Batista, Gisely Vieira
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Alagoas
Brasil
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Serviço Social
UFAL
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://www.repositorio.ufal.br/handle/riufal/4617
Resumo: This work has as object of study the World Bank guidelines for social security policies during the governments of Fernando Henrique Cardoso, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and Dilma Vana Rousseff. The study has as main objective to analyze the existing links between the guidelines of the World Bank and the implementation of social security policies in the government of Fernando Henrique Cardoso, Lula and Dilma, to identify the theoretical basis of these guidelines. This work was developed into two sections. The first, entitled "Capital Crisis, Public Fund and the World Bank: bases and assumptions of contemporary social policies" analyzes the capitalist context globalized, under the hegemony of finance capital, with emphasis on the discussion of contemporary crises in the system of capital and the dispute for appropriation of public funds. In the second section, entitled "The World Bank guidance to Brazilian Social Security policies in FHC, Lula and Dilma" seek to highlight the Bank's guidelines to Brazilian social security policies, namely: Health policies, Social Assistance and Social Welfare, paying attention to the theoretical basis of these guidelines. As a methodological procedure to achieve the proposed objective we used the literature needed to broader understanding regarding the links between the crisis of capital, the appropriation of public funds, the structural state of adjustment, materialized in contrarreformas thatIt has played the accumulation of capital interests by prioritizing macroeconomic policies and the privatization and commodification of social policies. It was also conducted documentary research, based on data contained in the documents produced by the World Bank, called Country Assistance Strategy - CAS or Country Assistance Strategies - EAP, and evaluation of World Bank assistance to the country, we can identify the continuity in the guidelines of the Bank of Brazil's social security policies. From the desk study developed have seen that the theoretical basis of the Bank's guidelines for social security policies ranging from the Washington Consensus to social-liberalism. With this, we seek to identify between these theoretical foundations, traces of continuity and / or rupture, with regard to the guidance of the World Bank to the Brazilian social security policies. So, whether under the aegis of neoliberalism, or under the social-liberal assumptions, Brazilian Social Security policies are marked by the tripod of privatization, decentralization and focus. Both neoliberalism, as the Social-liberalism represent the ideology of the ruling class, ie, represent the interests of capital and help in the reproduction of bourgeois society. Thus, the social function of the Bank is to reaffirm the bourgeois hegemony in the contemporary scene, through the political and ideological struggle that is still present, explaining the relevance of class struggle. Therefore, the World Bank guidelines to Brazilian social security policies are permeated by a deeply ideological dimension, political and economic. In the specific case of this study, there is the thought of the ideologue Amartya Sen who has been the major theoretical framework of the World Bank guidelines in the Brazilian social security policies. We critically its theoretical formulations guided by the "new" concept of poverty, with proposals for economic growth with social development.