Análise textual-argumentativa de processos de retextualização: um cotejo entre a produção oral e escrita de alunos do curso médio técnico e alunos do proeja ensino médio

• Ano de defesa: 2016
• Autor(a) principal: Cavalcanti, Ricardo Jorge de Sousa
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Alagoas; Brasil; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras e Linguística; UFAL
• Palavras-chave em Português: Linguística aplicada; Argumentação; Proocessos de retextualização; Lectoescritura de gêneros opinativos; Transposição do oral ao escrito; Argumentation; Retextualization processes; Lectoescritura of Opinionated genres; Transposition from oral to written; CNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICA
• Link de acesso: http://www.repositorio.ufal.br/handle/riufal/1361

This study aims to analyse the processes of Retextualization – practices of textual/discursive production in transposing from the orality to the written. This study is justified in an attempt to validate or demystify, to some extent, discussions concerning the alleged linguistic-discursive-argumentative low level that students have on arriving at the high school. Thus, this thesis aims to establish a discussion about the processes of Retextualization of collaborator students who are newcomers at vocational high school and members of Alagoas schools in the federal system, based on textual / discursive production of opinionated genres (Oral Exposure of Point of View and Article of Opinion). The groups are made up of thirty (30) students, some belonging to High School integrated to the Technical Course of Agro and Casttleraising and some belonging to the High School PROEJA/FIC with professional qualification in Computing. This research establishes a comparison, in a textual perspective and also linguistical-enunciative and rhetorical-discursive, between oral and written productions of these two groups, assumed as linguistic-interpretive, in a qualitative approach. The production of these opinionative genres through process of Retextualization considers the analysis of the product (final text) with a view to its production process. Instruments such as: profile questionnaire, field notes and interviews were used to conduct this research. The notion of discourse genre is covered from sources such as Bakhtin (2003 [1992]); the notions of genre according to Marcuschi‟s discussions (2002; 2008; 2012 [1983]), Fávero (1991; 2007), Koch (2007; 2009; 2014), among others; and consideration of gender as social action, based on Miller (1994). The argumentative content genres are treated in the view of the Rhetorical Argumentation (New Rhetoric), focusing in the categories of argumentative markers of subjectivity and the rhetorical places – topoi – (PERELMAN and OLBRECHTS-TYTECA, 2005 [1958]; REBOUL, 2004 [1998]); and Linguistical Argumentation (Argumentation Theory of Language), counting with the categories of the logical markers and the discoursive ones – interfrastic connectors – (DUCROT, 1987; KOCH, 1987); besides the operations available for the analysis of Retextualization activities from the orality to the writing, proposed by Marcuschi (2005 [2001]). In this work, the results pointed, to some extent, that the discontinued education, beyond the alleged absence from work with the argumentation in the classroom practices, pointed out by research collaborators, make it difficult the production of opinionated genres in the oral and written modality of newly arrived pupils to vocational high school.