A influência da mucosa queratinizada ao redor de implantes no desconforto à escovação e na saúde peri-implantar

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2014
Autor(a) principal: Souza, André Barbisan de
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Estadual de Maringá
Brasil
Departamento de Odontologia
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Odontologia Integrada
UEM
Maringá, PR
Centro de Ciências da Saúde
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.uem.br:8080/jspui/handle/1/2096
Resumo: The aim of thisstudy was to compare the degree of brushing discomfort (BD) and peri-implant soft tissues health in patients presenting implant sites with ≥ 2 mm or < 2 mm of keratinized mucosa (KM). The patients were recruited during their return for maintenance therapy from January to October, 2013. Based on the presence of KM, the patients were divided into 2 groups: presence of implant sites with ≥ 2 mm of KM (Group A) and presence of implant sites with < 2 mm of KM (Group B). At the beginning of the experiment, clinical measurements of plaque index (PI), probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical atachment level (CAL) and bleeding on probing (BoP) were performed in 3 sites/implant (buccal aspect). Immediately after oral hygiene instructions, the patients were asked to perform brushing of the experimental implant sites. Subsequently, the patients reported on the corresponding brushing discomfort using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Non-paired student-t test and Mann-Whitney test were performed to analyze the outcome variables. Level of significance was established in 5%. Seventy-nine patients with a total of 269 implant sites were included. The results showed that the implant sites in Group B exhibited more BD (p<0.001), PI (p=0.0021) and BoP (p=0.017) than the implant sites from Group A. It was demonstrated that implant sites with < 2 mm of KM were more prone to brushing discomfort, plaque accumulation and peri-implant inflammation.