O ceticismo e o naturalismo na filosofia de David Hume

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2014
Autor(a) principal: Souza, Donizeti Aparecido Pugin
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Estadual de Maringá
Brasil
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia
UEM
Maringá, PR
Centro de Ciências Humanas, Letras e Artes
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.uem.br:8080/jspui/handle/1/2748
Resumo: This work consists in an analysis of the relation between the skepticism and the naturalism presented in the philosophy of David Hume (1711-1776). It must be taken into account two important points of his epistemology: the self-definition as a skeptic, which serves as a counterpoint to the currents of philosophy that consider him only as a naturalist, and the awareness of the limits of this same skepticism, which should not be seen as a reliable resumption of the pyrrhonian skepticism, but as a mitigated or academic skepticism, as he himself notes it and proposes it. This way, it can be established a balance between these two points of convergence in his thought, understanding them as additional to the composition of the same human nature science. Our task is to establish a conciliation between the skepticism and naturalism in the philosophy of Hume, taking as a basis the mitigated skepticism defended by him in An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, and a unitary vision of his philosophical project from the human nature science, presented in the introduction to the Treatise of Human Nature.