O ceticismo e o naturalismo na filosofia de David Hume
Ano de defesa: | 2014 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá
Brasil Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia UEM Maringá, PR Centro de Ciências Humanas, Letras e Artes |
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Link de acesso: | http://repositorio.uem.br:8080/jspui/handle/1/2748 |
Resumo: | This work consists in an analysis of the relation between the skepticism and the naturalism presented in the philosophy of David Hume (1711-1776). It must be taken into account two important points of his epistemology: the self-definition as a skeptic, which serves as a counterpoint to the currents of philosophy that consider him only as a naturalist, and the awareness of the limits of this same skepticism, which should not be seen as a reliable resumption of the pyrrhonian skepticism, but as a mitigated or academic skepticism, as he himself notes it and proposes it. This way, it can be established a balance between these two points of convergence in his thought, understanding them as additional to the composition of the same human nature science. Our task is to establish a conciliation between the skepticism and naturalism in the philosophy of Hume, taking as a basis the mitigated skepticism defended by him in An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, and a unitary vision of his philosophical project from the human nature science, presented in the introduction to the Treatise of Human Nature. |