Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2015 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Batista, Adilson Carlos
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Venturini, Maria Cleci
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
UNICENTRO - Universidade Estadual do Centro Oeste
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras (Mestrado)
|
| Departamento: |
Unicentro::Departamento de Letras
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://localhost:8080/tede/handle/tede/79
|
Resumo: |
This dissertation examines, through French Discourse Analysis, founded by Michel Pêcheux, journalistic material elements that currently circulated through the network of computers about the same-sex relationship. The documents file from which we selected/excerpted news, cartoons, articles, among others which featured events around the homoafectivity, considering this media as a producer of the symbolic and also disseminating ideologies. The answered survey question is: How have the designations around the homoafectivity relationships changed over time and which discourses and memories sustain these changes in social formation? In order to answer this question we carried out the analytical course that aimed to show the designations around homoafectivity relationships have changed over time, putting on hold the meaning effects of these changes in the discourse around homosexual couples served in / by the journalistic media. First, we show how Discourse Analysis constitutes itself as an interpretative discipline and also did an analytical reflection from word to discourse, passing by the categories of analysis and developing, in this same chapter, discussions about the designations terms, as pointed out by Guimarães (1995/2005). As a result, we reflected on the designations used in history to refer to same-sex relationship, with a view to the reproductions and transformations of them according to the subjects affiliations in Discursive Formations (DF), and occupied positions on social and cultural formations. The investigation showed that the term pederasty belongs to philosophical discourse; sodomy to religious discourse; homosexualism/inverted and perverted, to the discourse of medicine and gay term is used among homoafective subjects. The term homoafective has its operation by legal discourse, being used around the politically correct. After the analysis of the terms route, we analised the materialities considering them as events, marked by repetition, by regularities and often breaking with them, establishing a discursive event. We also mobilized this investigation notions such as contradiction, antagonism, regularities, repetition and utterance-image, in-text image that circulated in the media. We did around the highlighted materialities, gestures of interpretation in order to check how the senses went in accordance to the membership in the FD and the memories that make them return, meaning and bringing significance of the same-sex relationship term course/discourse in social formation. |
