Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2016 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Silva, Leandro Batista da
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Almeida, Sandra Francesca Conte de
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa Strictu Sensu em Educa????o
|
| Departamento: |
Escola de Educa????o, Tecnologia e Comunica????o
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Resumo em Inglês: |
The school, as transmitting institution of all the accumulated cultural legacy of centuries by many societies, is a living organism, made up of people historically and culturally determined. For these reasons, it would be extremely impoverished want to research a complex plot that is built inside our schools only from the cold letter numbers or rates. During the process of learning, teacher and student develop relationship exchanges, deeply influenced by issues of affectivity. The affectivity, not rarely, is understood, in the educational context, in a contradictory way. Sometimes, it is believed to be only emotions (plastic expressions), or just feelings (psychologized representation); It is not observed that emotion and feeling are, together with the passions, the foundations of affectivity, and they should not be considered the affectivity itself. In addition to that, it is very common that the school is not able to recognize the role of affectivity in the construction of knowledge, reorganization of the cognitive aspect; for this reason, occasionally, affectivity and cognition are placed in opposite poles, and it not recognized that the first one is an important factor of influence on the capabilities (or on difficulties) of students in their learning pathways. This study surveyed the place of affectivity in the practices of teachers in successful public school in large-scale assessments (SAEB and ENEM). The study included six teachers, three public schools in the Federal District, two state schools and a federal school, which showed satisfactory rates in the ENEM and SAEB, according to which recommends the Federal Government. Interviews were conducted with these teachers, direct observation of their lessons - for half a year - and after that, a triangulation of data collection instruments was held from conducting focus groups with students of cooperating teachers. The research is based on theoretical assumptions of Henri Wallon. After analysis and discussion of the data, it was constituted the following meaning and units of meaning: "The teacher's view of the surveyed school and on large-scale assessments," "Conceptions of affectivity ", " affectivity, interaction and teaching practice ","Affectivity, learning and performance in large-scale assessments." From this analysis, it was seized, in teachers??? speech, their notion of affectivity and their effects on the teaching-learning process. It was also observed how the affectivity appears in the practices of cooperating teachers and ends up influencing the results obtained by students in external evaluations. Moreover, it was possible in all cores, fulfill the comparison of speech of the teachers with what was observed in their classes, and after that, contrast those opinions with the students??? points of view. The results show that teachers have a contradictory vision of affection, sometimes associating it to emotion, sometimes to the feeling (although not realize this duality). They do not realize, in their reports, that emotions and feelings, taken alone, do not express all possible range of affectivity. Also, it is noticeable in the accounts of the teachers, the belief that affectivity interfere in the results obtained in large-scale assessments; similarly, it appears in the speech of students, although teachers can not present, clearly, the situations in which this would occur. It also draws a lot of attention to the issue of the teachers perceive that the rates of large-scale assessments are just another indicator of the education course in their schools because they are aware that the concern with these rates should notexceed the commitment and attention to one teaching truly transformative and able to bring about change in the students??? lives |
| Link de acesso: |
https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/1955
|
Resumo: |
The school, as transmitting institution of all the accumulated cultural legacy of centuries by many societies, is a living organism, made up of people historically and culturally determined. For these reasons, it would be extremely impoverished want to research a complex plot that is built inside our schools only from the cold letter numbers or rates. During the process of learning, teacher and student develop relationship exchanges, deeply influenced by issues of affectivity. The affectivity, not rarely, is understood, in the educational context, in a contradictory way. Sometimes, it is believed to be only emotions (plastic expressions), or just feelings (psychologized representation); It is not observed that emotion and feeling are, together with the passions, the foundations of affectivity, and they should not be considered the affectivity itself. In addition to that, it is very common that the school is not able to recognize the role of affectivity in the construction of knowledge, reorganization of the cognitive aspect; for this reason, occasionally, affectivity and cognition are placed in opposite poles, and it not recognized that the first one is an important factor of influence on the capabilities (or on difficulties) of students in their learning pathways. This study surveyed the place of affectivity in the practices of teachers in successful public school in large-scale assessments (SAEB and ENEM). The study included six teachers, three public schools in the Federal District, two state schools and a federal school, which showed satisfactory rates in the ENEM and SAEB, according to which recommends the Federal Government. Interviews were conducted with these teachers, direct observation of their lessons - for half a year - and after that, a triangulation of data collection instruments was held from conducting focus groups with students of cooperating teachers. The research is based on theoretical assumptions of Henri Wallon. After analysis and discussion of the data, it was constituted the following meaning and units of meaning: "The teacher's view of the surveyed school and on large-scale assessments," "Conceptions of affectivity ", " affectivity, interaction and teaching practice ","Affectivity, learning and performance in large-scale assessments." From this analysis, it was seized, in teachers??? speech, their notion of affectivity and their effects on the teaching-learning process. It was also observed how the affectivity appears in the practices of cooperating teachers and ends up influencing the results obtained by students in external evaluations. Moreover, it was possible in all cores, fulfill the comparison of speech of the teachers with what was observed in their classes, and after that, contrast those opinions with the students??? points of view. The results show that teachers have a contradictory vision of affection, sometimes associating it to emotion, sometimes to the feeling (although not realize this duality). They do not realize, in their reports, that emotions and feelings, taken alone, do not express all possible range of affectivity. Also, it is noticeable in the accounts of the teachers, the belief that affectivity interfere in the results obtained in large-scale assessments; similarly, it appears in the speech of students, although teachers can not present, clearly, the situations in which this would occur. It also draws a lot of attention to the issue of the teachers perceive that the rates of large-scale assessments are just another indicator of the education course in their schools because they are aware that the concern with these rates should notexceed the commitment and attention to one teaching truly transformative and able to bring about change in the students??? lives |
