Promessas constitucionais e pol??ticas p??blicas: o controle das decis??es pol??ticas no processo de formula????o das pol??ticas p??blicas e o papel do Minist??rio P??blico

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2016
Autor(a) principal: Silva Neto, Nathan da lattes
Orientador(a): Tabak, Benjamin Miranda lattes
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa Strictu Sensu em Direito
Departamento: Escola de Humanidade e Direito
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Resumo em Inglês: This study supports the idea that the intervention of the public prosecutor in the public policy process, ie, the steps of creation of public policies, as policy decisions watchdog, is a measure that provides editing policies compliant with the Federal Constitution, ie, quality public policy, efficient, and able to promote the evolution of Brazilian society, always with respect to the constitutional precepts. Initially, the study presents a conceptual notion of public policy, pointing at this point, a behavioral approach to this conceptual notion. Further, we state that the formulation of activity of public policy stems from an eminently political and decision-making, marked, therefore, by an immanent discretion. On the characteristics that mark this formulation process, the study addresses the theories of public choices and limited rationality to demonstrate the need for control of the decisions taken in the public policy process, given the risks arising from the political discretion abuse. The study presents a constitutional notion of discretion to highlight the submission process of developing public policies to constitutional principles. In this discussion, we stress the constitutional principle of efficiency and its close relationship with the Economic Analysis of Law, a connection that increases the demand for great public policy, top quality, considering the resources available. Given the concern to ensure the formulation of appropriate public policies (efficient, high quality) the study concludes that the prosecution, because of its constitutional profile and the legal instruments available to it, can and should manage a set of strengthening relations / punishment to control the decisions of policy makers in order to edit that public policy in accordance with the Federal Constitution.
Link de acesso: https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2262
Resumo: This study supports the idea that the intervention of the public prosecutor in the public policy process, ie, the steps of creation of public policies, as policy decisions watchdog, is a measure that provides editing policies compliant with the Federal Constitution, ie, quality public policy, efficient, and able to promote the evolution of Brazilian society, always with respect to the constitutional precepts. Initially, the study presents a conceptual notion of public policy, pointing at this point, a behavioral approach to this conceptual notion. Further, we state that the formulation of activity of public policy stems from an eminently political and decision-making, marked, therefore, by an immanent discretion. On the characteristics that mark this formulation process, the study addresses the theories of public choices and limited rationality to demonstrate the need for control of the decisions taken in the public policy process, given the risks arising from the political discretion abuse. The study presents a constitutional notion of discretion to highlight the submission process of developing public policies to constitutional principles. In this discussion, we stress the constitutional principle of efficiency and its close relationship with the Economic Analysis of Law, a connection that increases the demand for great public policy, top quality, considering the resources available. Given the concern to ensure the formulation of appropriate public policies (efficient, high quality) the study concludes that the prosecution, because of its constitutional profile and the legal instruments available to it, can and should manage a set of strengthening relations / punishment to control the decisions of policy makers in order to edit that public policy in accordance with the Federal Constitution.