Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2022 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Lira, Marcelino Jorge da Silva
 |
Orientador(a): |
Queiroz, Edilene Ferraz de |
Banca de defesa: |
Francisco, Ana Lúcia,
Mello, Marília Montenegro de,
Mendes , Élio Braz,
Marin, Isabel Khan |
Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Católica de Pernambuco
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Doutorado em Psicologia Clínica
|
Departamento: |
Departamento de Pós-Graduação
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/1623
|
Resumo: |
The present thesis aimed to understand the perspective of criminal persecutors on accused of “rape of the vulnerable”, since the crime of abuse of the vulnerable is closely related to the violation of a taboo. It was possible to carry out 10 semistructured interviews with operators of the criminal legal system (two judges, two district prosecutors, one state attorney, one delegate, one prison security agent and three lawyers), despite 30 refusals, which already connotes the difficulty and unavailability of speaking of a taboo topic. The means of formation of the legal operator, the professional position, as well as their cultural sources constituted important elements in the formation of the image that each operator kept of their experiences in accompanying understand the vision of criminal persecutors about people accused of rape of vulnerable once that the crime of abuse of the vulnerable is closely related to the violation of a taboo. In the first chapters, considerations were made on social values and taboos, on what the legal literature has on the crime of abuse of the vulnerable, in order to enter the voices of the countryside. From the narratives, it was possible to extract relevant discussions regarding the way of conceiving and analyzing the crime considering the gender variable of the abuser and the victim, the association of crime with the expression of madness and unreason, the variation of punishment criteria, the contagion that this crime causes and forms of exile. Finally, the limit of the right before the taboo was discussed. The breach of the taboo norm produces the dread of disruption, and only the legal response seems to be ineffective to appease the effect of this transgression, which is why the penalty is considered insufficient to atone for the seriousness of the crime. |