Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2012 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Branco, Cícero Santos |
| Orientador(a): |
Schlindwein, Marcelo Nivert
 |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Rural - PPGADR-Ar
|
| Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/157
|
Resumo: |
The present work evaluated a proposed methodology to analyze the aspects that involve the dynamics of the agroecosystem valuing the interactions among dimensions: ecological, social and agroecological practice, the last one being developed by farmer, aiming to identify at what stage of agroecological transition is inserted, valuing the aspects in the quantitative and qualitative way involving the processes, and that be useful as a management tool, based on the principle of multiple functions and management. The indicators analyzed proved feasible because there was the possibility of analyzing and comparing the rates obtained serving as a management tool for the agroecosystem. From the fifteen analyzed agroecosystems, 6,66% were classified on agroecological transition consolidated stage, 13,33% of agroecosystems were classified on agroecological transition consolidation stage on as the field protocol, 46,66% on agroecological transition capacitance stage and 33,33% were classfied on agroecological transition initial stage. None of the analyzed agrecosystems were classified on conventional stage. As a conclusion on obtained data the field protocol shows be efficient tool of management and agroecosystems analysis. |
