Associação do nível de atividade física e do tempo sentado com o ângulo de fase da bioimpedância

• Ano de defesa: 2018
• Autor(a) principal: Mundstock, Eduardo
• Orientador(a): Mattiello, Rita
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/Pediatria e Saúde da Criança
• Departamento: Escola de Medicina
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Bioimpedância; Ângulo de Fase; Atividade Física; Tempo Sentado
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Bioimpedance; Phase Angle; Physical activity; Sitting Time
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::MEDICINA; CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::EDUCACAO FISICA
• Link de acesso: http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8107

Introduction: The phase angle is considered an important prognostic marker because it reflects cellular health. Inadequate physical activity and sitting time are associated with a significant number of chronic noncommunicable diseases. Recent studies suggest that these two factors may be associated with phase angle values. Objective: to verify the association of phase angle with physical activity Methodology: the thesis will present two articles: a systematic review with metaanalysis and a cross-section article. Meta-analysis: We searched the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SciELO, LILACS, SPORTDiscus, Scopus and Web of Science. Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility criteria and bias risks. The results were synthesized using random effects models. The association between physical activity and phase angle was evaluated considering the design of the study. Cross-sectional study: individuals over 11 years of age, of both sexes, who met bioimpedance assessment criteria and without diagnosis of chronic disease, were invited to participate in the study. The phase angle evaluation was performed using Ottoboni's Biospace equipment, model InBodyS10. Physical activity level and sitting time were assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). The association between the phase angle and the predictor variables was evaluated using a univariate and multivariate generalized linear model (GLM). All variables with a value of p <0.20 were included in the multivariate model. In the final model, only the variables with p <0.05 were included. Results: Systematic Review: Nine studies, totaling 575 participants, were included in the meta-analysis. The results of cross-sectional studies indicate that the active subjects presented a mean value of higher phase angle when compared to controls (DM = 0.70, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.92, P <0.001), with low heterogeneity (I2 = 0%, P = 0.619). In the crosssectional analysis, the differences between health status and type of physical activity evaluation were not significant (P = 0.332, P <0.253). In longitudinal studies (clinical trial and follow-up), mean values of final phase angle increased significantly compared to baseline (DM = 0.30, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.49, P <0.001), with low heterogeneity (I2 = 13%, P = 0.331). The differences were not significant in relation to the state of health and the type of longitudinal study (clinical trials or follow-up studies) (P = 0.900; 0.989). Evidence of publication bias was not observed, and the overall risk of bias was moderate to high. Cross-sectional article: 1228 subjects were included. The multivariate generalized linear model showed that both physical activity (β = 0.164, 95% CI 0.071 to 0.256, P = 0.001) and sitting time (β = 0.152, 95% CI 0.063 to 0, 242, P = 0.001) were determinant for the phase angle. As well as sex, body mass index and age, also remained associated with phase angle (β = -0.890, 95%CI -0.975 to -0.806, P <0.001; β = 0.037, 95%CI 0.029 to 0,045, p <0.001 e; β = -0.006, 95%CI -0.008 to -0.003 P<0.001, respectively). Conclusion: The results of the systematic review and the cross-sectional article suggest an association of phase angle with physical activity and sitting time. Among the main factors that may explain the positive effect of physical activity on the phase angle are the increase in cell membrane integrity and the change in intracellular content, these factors reflecting the cellular health and, consequently, the health of the individual.