Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2021 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Rodrigues, Viviane Isabela
 |
Orientador(a): |
Reis, Carlos Nelson dos
 |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Serviço Social
|
Departamento: |
Escola de Humanidades
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/9626
|
Resumo: |
This thesis analyzed how the countries of Latin America, especially Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Uruguay direct their weights of social protection within the alternation of progressive and conservative governments in the last three decades, and in which way both integrated in their governmental schedules the neoliberal recommendations of multilateral agencies in the development of their social agenda. Such investigation abled to observe the dialectical movements of expansion and retraction of social protection visible by the behavior of public social spent and the longitudinal performance of social indicators of health, education, and social assistance. The analysis here focused on governmental alternation of 25 governments (progressive and conservative); on 18 longitudinal social indicators, published by Cepal and World Bank, from 1990 to 2018, as well as on the study of allusive action plans to eight meetings of Summit of the Americas of the last three decades. Therefore, we used the dialectical and critical method as a structural theory. Furthermore, in methodology, the study was qualitative and quantitative and exploratory, based on a documental and bibliographical research. The data were checked from the methodology of the text discursive analysis. Facing the exposed, we could identify the appearance of three great cycles of social protection emerging in the region in the last three decades: the 1st neoliberal and neoconservative cycle, the 2nd neoliberal and progressive cycle, and the 3rd neoliberal and neoconservative cycle. We observed the progressive and conservative governments of Latin America formulated politics of social protection, incorporating the orientations of multilateral agencies of development, and producing protective cycles subjected to economic and political cycles of the region, emphasizing the bigger advance in protective systems observed during the progressive governments. Considering the emergent global health crisis and to conclude this thesis, in the end we present data allusive to the challenges of protective systems of the region in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic. |