Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2021 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Fraga, David dos Santos
 |
Orientador(a): |
Madarasz, Norman Roland
 |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia
|
Departamento: |
Escola de Humanidades
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/9556
|
Resumo: |
This dissertation aims to analyze and reconstitute Sophistic thought as it emerges from the research of the French scholar, Barbara Cassin. The dominant philosophical tradition has delegated Sophistic thought to the status of pseudo, Not-Being, false. Conversely, Sophistic thought understands philosophy as a fact of language. This can be seen in Gorgias, who makes an inversion of Parmenides' poem that compromises the “Being” of ontology by showing the Not-Being of Being, and in Antiphon, who makes the transition from the physical to the political. Meanwhile, Philostratus and Lucian later reappeared with the Second Sophistic, being no longer part of the philosophers but of the speakers who inaugurate the novel, a discourse that is known as pseudo and claims to be pseudo, renouncing all ontological adequacy to produce its own world-effect. |